Home/Sponsored Articles
|
Posted 03/03/2021
Author: Fiona M Greer, BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD, Independent Consultant
Abstract
Debate continues on the requirement for different types of data to demonstrate biosimilarity, with some regulators expressing expectations of a future without large expensive comparative efficacy studies. Proposed changes of regulatory emphasis reinforce the importance of choosing orthogonal analytical techniques to interrogate quality attributes (QA) when assessing biosimilarity.
Keywords: Biosimilar testing, biosimilarity, characterization techniques, orthogonality, regulatory requirements
Introduction
Evolution of biosimilar guidelines
For some time now, a hot topic of discussion has concerned the types of data, non-clinical and clinical, required for demonstration of biosimilarity and the ability of analytical characterization to provide an accurate understanding of originator and biosimilar molecules, in turn arguably reducing the need for large phase III clinical trials.