A review by Teixeira FV et al. discusses whether scientific evidence is sufficient to support multiple switches between biologicals and biosimilars in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1].
IBD currently imposes an immense social and economic burden on society in terms of both direct and indirect healthcare costs. Their incurable and progressive nature results in unavoidable lifetime expenses. The introduction of infliximab more than two decades ago revolutionized IBD treatment. Nowadays, while biological drugs provide various vital therapeutic options for patients, they can be associated with significant costs to healthcare systems.
According to Teixeira et al., the most crucial benefit of biosimilars is that they provide significant cost reductions and increase access to advanced therapies. They also enable the treatment of newly diagnosed patients and allow for dose optimization in those who need it. There is an inverse relationship between the price of biologicals and the demand for treatment. To achieve a more substantial reduction in cost, greater use of biosimilars is necessary. For this to happen, it is essential not only to use biosimilars in naïve patients but also to switch to biosimilars for patients who have already started therapy with reference biologicals.
At present, randomized and observational studies have demonstrated effectiveness and safety in recommending a single switch between a reference product and a biosimilar, and vice versa.
To address the question of whether we are prepared for multiple switches, the authors’ answer is YES. This response is based on robust scientific and clinical evidence accumulated over the past decade since the approval of the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody.
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [2] found no differences in the risk of death, serious adverse events, and treatment discontinuations between participants who switched between biosimilars and reference products and those who did not switch.
The authors acknowledged that, although scepticism is warranted due to the relatively recent clinical experience with multiple switches, prospective observational studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety data comparable to that observed with a single switch.
This is evident from the document published by the European Medicines Agency in late 2022, declaring that all monoclonal biosimilars are interchangeable [3]. The authors believe that multiple switches can be carried out effectively and safely; however, this does not negate the need for appropriate counselling, objective assessment of disease activity, and potential side effects before switching, as well as careful follow-up post-switch. This approach will help to ensure optimal patient care while also achieving the financial benefits of a switch policy.
In June 2024, FDA released updated draft guidance titled ‘Considerations for Demonstrating Interchangeability with a Reference Product: Update’, proposing a revised approach to switching studies. This could potentially lead to all FDA-approved biosimilars being considered interchangeable without the need for additional switching studies [4].
However, some are concerned that removing the interchangeable designation could jeopardize physician confidence and patient health regarding biosimilars [5]. They argued that the US interchangeable standard has helped drive physician and patient confidence and uptake in biosimilars, and advocate for preserving this standard [6].
Conflict of interest
The authors of the research paper [1] declared that there was various conflict of interest.
Abstracted by Fabio Vieira Teixeira, member of the IBD Brazilian Study Group GEDIIB and the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization, IBD Center, GastroSaude Clinic, Marilia, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Editor’s comment
Readers interested to learn more about switching between biosimilars and reference products are invited to visit www.gabi-journal.net to view the following manuscript published in GaBI Journal:
Non-medical switching of biologicals/biosimilars: Canada, Europe and the US – a webinar report
GaBI Journal is indexed in Embase, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index and more.
Readers interested in contributing a research or perspective paper to GaBI Journal – an independent, peer reviewed academic journal – please send us your submission here.
GaBI Journal Citation Impact
1.8 – CiteScore 2023 (calculated on 5 May 2024)
0.9 – CiteScoreTracker 2024 (Last updated on 8 July 2024)
Submit a manuscript to GaBI Journal
Related articles
Canada’s Prince Edward Island adopts biosimilars switching policy
FDA issues draft guidance on biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars labelling
|
LATIN AMERICAN FORUM
The new section of the ‘Latin American Forum’ on GaBI has been launched. The objective of this new section is to provide you with all the latest news and updates on developments of generic and biosimilar medicines in Latin America in Spanish. View the latest headline article: Richmond lanzará los biológicos similares bevacizumab Yriviak y adalimumab Armixa Browse the news in the Latin American Forum! Register to receive the GaBI Latin American Forum newsletter. Inform colleagues and friends of this new initiative.
FORO LATINOAMERICANO
Se ha lanzado la nueva sección del ‘Foro Latinoamericano’ sobre GaBI. El objetivo de esta nueva sección es brindarle las últimas noticias y actualizaciones sobre desarrollos de medicamentos genéricos y biosimilares en América Latina en español. Ver el último artículo de cabecera: Richmond lanzará los biológicos similares bevacizumab Yriviak y adalimumab Armixa !Explore las noticias en el Foro Latinoamericano! Regístrese para recibir el boletín informativo GaBI Foro Latinoamericano. Informe a colegas y amigos sobre esta nueva iniciativa.
|
References
1. Teixeira FV, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Are we ready for multiple switches between reference products and biosimilars?
2. Schrieber S. Switches between biosimilars and their reference products. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal (GaBI Journal). 2023;12(3):106. doi:10.5639/gabij.2023.1203.016
3. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. EMA calls for biosimilar interchangeability across the EU [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2024 Aug 13]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/biosimilars/general/ema-calls-for-biosimilar-interchangeability-across-the-eu
4. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA interchangeable biosimilars guidance update on revised approach to switching studies [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2024 Aug 13]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/guidelines/fda-interchangeable-biosimilars-guidance-update-on-revised-approach-to-switching-studies
5. Reilly MS, McKibbin RD. Misinformation about interchangeable biosimilars undermines US health policy, physician confidence, and patient health. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal (GaBI Journal). 2024;13(2): Epub ahead of print.
6. Reilly MS. Preserve the US interchangeable standard that has helped drive physician and patient confidence in biosimilars. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal (GaBI Journal). 2024;13(1):34-6. doi:10.5639/gabij.2023.1301.006
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2024 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
0
Post your comment