Cost-savings from higher biosimilar uptake and more appropriate use of ESAs

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 14/05/2021 post-comment0 Post your comment

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing public health issue worldwide. In Italy, the prevalence of CKD is 7.5% in men and 6.5% in women [1]. In Italy, the annual direct costs of management for patients on dialysis were estimated to be around €30,000 for peritoneal dialysis and €44,000 for haemodialysis [2]. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have a significant economic burden in CKD as they are widely used to treat CKD-related anaemia; biosimilars can guarantee a 20%–30% saving on ESA purchase costs in CKD patients [3].

79 MD002389

A multicentre, cohort study [4] aimed to investigate the direct healthcare costs of CKD patients treated with ESAs and the potential savings achievable by increasing the use of biosimilars and preventing inappropriate ESA use.

This population-based study was conducted using the claims databases of Tuscany, Umbria Regions and Caserta, Treviso, Palermo Local Health Units (LHUs), covering a total population of around eight million people (13.2% of the total Italian population) during the years 2009–2014. For the Umbria region, the available observation period was from 2011 to 2014. From the source population, patients were included in the study if they met all the following criteria: a) had at least two ESA pharmacy claims during the study period (first pharmacy claim: Index date, ID) separated by < 365 days and no ESA pharmacy claims within one year prior to ID, i.e. incident ESA users; b) had at least 365 days pre- and post-index continuous enrolment in their database; c) had at least one medical claim with a diagnosis of CKD any time prior to ID, including the ID. Finally, among incident ESA users with CKD, all patients with known CKD stage were identified. Incident ESA users with CKD included in the study cohort were described at baseline in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, number of hospitalizations, concomitant drugs and CKD stage, i.e. stage I-III, stage IV-V and dialysis. All analyses were stratified by type of ESA dispensed at ID. Yearly mean direct healthcare costs per patient were estimated, stratifying by CKD stage. The total yearly cost and potential savings related to ESA use were estimated: a) considering 25%/50%/75% of originator ESA substitution with biosimilars; b) eliminating inappropriate ESA dispensing.

During the study period, on a total population of 7,939,874 subjects registered in the five study centres, 7,810 (0.1%) incident ESA users with CKD were treated for at least 1 year (reference product: 1,139, 14.6%; biosimilars: 1,204, 15.4%; other originator ESAs: 5,467, 70.0%). For 2,921 (37.4%) of these incident ESA users, information on CKD stage was available. There were no statistically significant age and sex differences across incident users of different ESA types. The ESA-related yearly mean cost represented 17% of total yearly costs in stage I-III, decreasing to 13% in stage IV-V and 6% in dialysis. Among originator users, assuming 25% biosimilar uptake, the annual cost-savings of ESA treatment would amount to €161,417 (10.0% of total ESA costs) in CKD stage I-III, €112,512 (10.9%) in CKD stage IV-V and €136,972 (7.7%) in dialysis. Assuming 50% or 75% substitution of originator with biosimilar ESA, these cost-savings would increase up to 15%–30% of total ESA costs. Among incident ESA users for which haemoglobin levels were available, 9% started inappropriate ESA treatment, increasing to 62.0% during the first year of maintenance therapy. Hypothesizing prevention of the first inappropriate ESA dispensing, the total yearly cost-savings would amount to €35,772, increasing to €167,641 when all inappropriate dispensing during maintenance therapy was removed.

The authors concluded that a high cost of CKD management among dialysis patients was observed in this study as it was elsewhere, but an unexpected level of inappropriate ESA use contributed more than €165,000 in preventable costs per year. The use of biosimilars was observed in 15% of new ESA users with CKD treated for at least 1 year, while the remainder used originator ESAs. With a higher use of biosimilar ESAs the annual cost-savings would range from 8% to 30% of the total ESA costs. Higher use of the lowest cost ESA and prevention of inappropriate ESA use, as well as other strategies aimed at slowing down progressive renal impairment, are essential for minimizing the clinical and economic burden of CKD.

Conflict of interest
The author of the paper [4] reported that the study was conducted in the context of the ‘Assessment of short- and long-term risk-benefit profile of biologics through healthcare database network in Italy’ project, which was funded by Italian Ministry of Health.

Abstracted by Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Italy.

GaBI Journal Citation Impact
1.7 – CiteScore 2019 (calculated on 6 May 2020)
1.9 – CiteScoreTracker 2020 (Last updated on 6 April 2021)

Submit a manuscript to GaBI Journal

Related articles
Switching from originator to biosimilar epoetins appears to be effective and safe

ASCO/ASH give recommendations for biosimilar ESAs


To further enhance the objectives of GaBI in sharing information and knowledge that ensure policies supportive of safe biosimilars use, we are pleased to announce that we will be launching a new section on GaBI Online and GaBI Journal, the ‘Latin American Forum’ (in Spanish) featuring the latest news and updates on research and developments in generic and biosimilar medicines in Latin America.

Register to receive the GaBI Latin American Forum newsletter. Inform colleagues and friends of this new initiative.



Para fomentar los objetivos de GaBI sobre la difusión de información y conocimiento sobre las políticas de apoyo que garantizan el uso seguro de medicamentos biosimilares, nos complace anunciar el lanzamiento de una nueva sección en GaBI Online y GaBI Journal, el ‘Latin American Forum’ (en español), que presentará las últimas noticias y actualizaciones en investigación y desarrollo sobre medicamentos genéricos y biosimilares en Latinoamérica.

Regístrese para recibir el boletín informativo GaBI Latin American Forum. Informe a colegas y amigos sobre esta nueva iniciativa. 

1. De Nicola L, Donfrancesco C, Minutolo R, et al. Prevalence and cardiovascular risk profile of chronic kidney disease in Italy: results of the 2008-12 National Health Examination Survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(5):806-14.
2. Cicchetti A, Ruggeri M, Codella P, et al. I costi socio-sanitari dell'insufficienza renale cronica. Farme percorsi Ter. 2011;12(1):21-8.
3. Ingrasciotta Y, Belleudi V, Trotta F, et al. In search of predictors of switching between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in clinical practice: a multi-regional cohort study. BioDrugs. 2020;34(1):55-64.
4. Ingrasciotta Y, Sultana J, Formica D, et al. Direct healthcare costs of chronic kidney disease management in Italy: what cost-savings can be achieved with higher biosimilar uptake and more appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(1):65-77.

Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.

Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2021 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.

comment icon Comments (0)
Post your comment
Related content
Clinical development of biosimilars in the oncology setting
Cancer image015
Biosimilars/Research Posted 17/09/2021
Knowledge and perceptions of naming for biosimilars in the US
Naming 1 V13I27
Biosimilars/Research Posted 10/09/2021
New quality-range-setting method for biosimilarity assessment
127 AA010925
Biosimilars/Research Posted 10/09/2021
Most viewed articles
About GaBI
Home/About GaBI Posted 05/08/2009
EU guidelines for biosimilars
EMA logo 1 V13C15
Home/Guidelines Posted 08/10/2010