Biosimilars/Research

EBE reveals Europe’s biosimilar pricing and reimbursement policies landscape

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 15/02/2018

The first biosimilar was approved in the European Union (EU) in 2006. Since then, biosimilar policies have been developed with a focus on increasing biosimilar uptake. However, the extent to which EU Member State polices differentiate between biosimilars and generic medicines has been brought into question. The European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises (EBE) has conducted a second survey on pricing and reimbursement policies for off-patent biologicals to map the biosimilar policy landscape in Europe [1].

Quality and clinical performance of biopharmaceuticals

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 15/02/2018

A review carried out by researchers from Sandoz describes the inherent nature of biopharmaceutical heterogeneity and discusses modern quality systems and regulatory frameworks used to maintain biopharmaceutical quality and clinical performance [1].

Zarxio reveals all: the US biosimilars market

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 09/02/2018

Launched in 2015, Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz) was the first biosimilar to gain US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval [1]. It competes with Neupogen (its reference product), Granix and Neulasta, for a share of the neutropenia market. This approval came almost a decade after the 2006 launch of the first biosimilar in Europe. Following this, a new study has examined Zarxio’s first years’ performance in the US short-acting (SA) filgrastim market to identify key sales and marketing trends and their drivers [2].

The biosimilar landscape in Italy revealed

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 02/02/2018

In Italy, health services are run at the regional level. To date, there has been no systematic monitoring of the uptake of biosimilars at a national or regional level. As such, the biosimilar landscape in Italy has not been well understood. However, a recent paper now provides an overview of the available real-world data relating to the patterns of use and the comparative effectiveness of biosimilars and originator biological drugs in Italy [1].

Danish etanercept switching study investigates withdrawal rates

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 02/02/2018

A study carried out by researchers from Denmark has investigated switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept 1-year post switch [1].

Switching to biosimilars in rheumatology

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 26/01/2018

Researchers from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, the UK and the US investigated switching from originator biologicals to biosimilars [1].

Additional clinical data for Cinfa’s pegfilgrastim biosimilar

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 19/01/2018

Spanish biosimilars developer Cinfa Biotech (Cinfa) announced on 2 November 2017 additional clinical data for its candidate pegfilgrastim biosimilar (B12019).

Switching failures with biosimilar etanercept

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 12/01/2018

A study carried out by researchers from Denmark has found that switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept does not work for all patients [1].

Reimbursement for oncology biosimilars in the US

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 05/01/2018

How reimbursement issues for biosimilars might affect US oncologists was a subject discussed by Dr Rena Conti, Associate Professor of Health Policy and Economics in the Department of Paediatrics at the University of Chicago, USA [1].

Impact of follow-on biological products in the Brazilian health system

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 05/01/2018

Cancer is an epidemic disease in the 21st century. However, despite consistent increases on its incidence worldwide, mortality rates have fallen, especially in developed countries [1, 2]. The victories mankind has achieved in the war against cancer result from advances in different fields, such as early diagnosis and better surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic treatments.

Hospital specialists and pharmacists surveyed about biosimilars

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 08/12/2017

Biological medicines are essential for many acute and chronic conditions, but their consumption differs widely among European countries [1, 2]. In contrast with the procedures for their approval [3], position papers from scientific societies suggest that biosimilars need to be tested in well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials, especially for extrapolation of indications [4, 5]. Nevertheless, switches with originators are becoming common and no serious adverse effects have been reported to date [6-8].

Positive phase III switching results for Celltrion’s infliximab biosimilar

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 08/12/2017

Results of a phase III extension study have shown that Celltrion Healthcare’s (Celltrion) infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) is shown to be comparable in efficacy and safety to Johnson & Johnson/Merck’s Remicade in switched inflammatory bowel disease patients, according to the South Korean biotechnology company.

Switching from reference infliximab to CT P13 in IBD patients

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 01/12/2017

Argüelles-Arias and colleagues from the Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena and the University of Seville in Spain carried out an observational study assessing the efficacy and safety of switching from Remicade to CT P13 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for up to 12 months [1].

Switching to biosimilar infliximab in IBD patients

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 24/11/2017

Biological agents, such as infliximab, have transformed the outcomes of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The advent of biosimilar treatment options, such as CT‑P13 (Remsima/Inflectra), promises to improve the availability of biological therapy.

Biosimilars in oncology in the US

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 24/11/2017

As part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act) allows for an abbreviated license pathway for the approval of biosimilars in the US. In light of continuing increases in healthcare costs, particularly for cancer drugs, use of biosimilars is increasingly being considered as a strategy for containing the cost of cancer care, according to Dr Gary Lyman of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA [1, 2].

Loss of efficacy after switching to biosimilar infliximab in Behcet’s patients

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 17/11/2017

Authors from the Division of Rheumatology at the Hospital of Prato, Italy report on three patients with Behçet’s disease that experienced disease relapses after switching from the originator infliximab, Remicade, to biosimilar infliximab [1].

Opportunities and challenges for biosimilars in oncology

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 17/11/2017

The rapid increase in healthcare costs, particularly for cancer drugs, has had a major impact on providers, practices, payers and patients, according to Dr Gary Lyman of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA [1, 2].

Phase III switching data support long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilar Truxima

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 10/11/2017

Results of a phase III extension study have shown that Celltrion Healthcare’s (Celltrion) rituximab biosimilar (Truxima, CT-P10) is comparable to Roche’s MabThera/Rituxan, according to the South Korean biotechnology company.

Physicochemical and biological characterization study of copy biological tocilizumab

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 10/11/2017

Researchers in China have developed a copy biological of F. Hoffmann-La Roche’s  (Roche) arthritis treatment Actemra (tocilizumab). A recent study compares it to the originator, finding it to be highly similar in terms of its physical, chemical and biological characteristics [1].

Australian prescribers’ views on biologicals naming and substitution

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 03/11/2017

In a survey of 160 prescribers of biologicals in Australia, over three quarters agreed that the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) should insist on distinct non-proprietary scientific names for all biosimilars and reference products. The results of the survey were published just as TGA launched a public consultation on proposals for potential biological naming systems. A clear majority (98%) of prescribers who took part in the survey, run by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM), said they currently used either brand name or non-proprietary scientific names for recording and prescribing biosimilars and reference products [1]. Most (61%) wanted TGA to play a major role in naming biosimilars.