Biosimilars/Research

Scientific rationale for extrapolation of cancer indications

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 07/07/2017

Extrapolation involves extending and applying the data from clinical studies regarding one medical condition to another medical condition. Once biosimilarity has been proven, biosimilars can also be approved for one or more additional indications held by the reference product, without the need for clinical data in those indications. Author Michinori Ogura from the Tokai Central Hospital, Gifu, Japan and colleagues from France and South Korea investigated the scientific rationale for extrapolation using the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 as an example [1].

Biosimilar insulins have same efficacy and safety as reference biologicals

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 29/06/2018

Researchers from the US have found that biosimilar insulins have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as their reference biologicals [1].

Savings with use of biosimilar trastuzumab for breast cancer patients in Croatia

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 29/06/2018

Breast cancer is worldwide the most common cancer in women. In 2012 alone, there were approximately 464,000 new cases and 131,000 deaths from breast cancer in Europe. In Croatia, breast cancer was the fourth leading cause of death among women and ninth in both sexes in 2016.

Biosimilars and the role of regulatory authorities

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 22/06/2018

According to authors Hye-Na Kang and Ivana Knezevic, from the World Health Organization (WHO), market access to biosimilars can be restricted by several factors [1]:
(i) manufacturing processes may be expensive and complex
(ii) patents on the manufacturing processes of the original product may not have expired
(iii) biosimilar manufacturers may have limited access to data on the original product
(iv) appropriate regulatory frameworks may not be in place
(v) government policies on switching to biosimilars, pricing and reimbursement may be lacking.

Life cycle and regulatory evaluation of biosimilars

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 15/06/2018

The life cycle of a biosimilar, like any biological, starts with research and development, then manufacturing, and is followed by regulatory evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy for both licensing and post-licensing oversight. Once licensed, a biosimilar is an individual product and post-licensing evaluation should be carried out like any other biological. The only difference for a biosimilar is that regulatory approval relies on the safety and efficacy data and knowledge gained during the development and licensing of an originator, or reference product.

Regulating biosimilars throughout their life cycle

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 08/06/2018

A resolution to increase access to life-saving biologicals was passed in May 2014 at the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly of the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. However, there still exist barriers to market access for biosimilars. Authors Drs Hye-Na Kang and Ivana Knezevic, from WHO, discuss the factors that give rise to these barriers and explain the importance of regulatory oversight throughout the product life-cycle of biosimilars [2].

Interchangeability between infliximab biosimilars with respect to immunogenicity

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 01/06/2018

In their editorial, Katsanos and colleagues [1] discuss a study carried out by Italian and Spanish researchers on the immunogenicity of infliximab biosimilars that finds that there is full interchangeability between infliximab biosimilars with respect to immunogenicity [2].

Utilization data and cost-effectiveness of infliximab biosimilar

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 25/05/2018

Studies of Celltrion/Hospira’s infliximab biosimilar (CT‑P13, Remsima/Inflectra) carried out in Canada and Germany have shown that, although there are large savings to be made, there are ‘significant differences in real-world utilization patterns’ of patients prescribed originator infliximab compared to those prescribed biosimilar infliximab (CT‑P13) [1, 2].

Secrecy is an obstacle to the use of biosimilars in the US

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 11/05/2018

Factors that Professor Frank believes may be affecting uptake include naming and interchangeability guidance, insurance payment arrangements and secrecy about manufacturing processes [1]. In this article, secrecy about manufacturing processes is discussed.

Insurance payment arrangements are an obstacle to biosimilars use in the US

Biosimilars/Research | Posted 04/05/2018

The slow development of the market competition for biosimilars in the US may be caused by several factors, according to Professor Richard Frank from the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA [1]. In this article, insurance payment arrangements for biologicals and biosimilars are discussed.