The first biosimilar entered the Canadian market in 2009 and the first ophthalmic biosimilar was approved in 2022. Now, a report based on the results of a 2022 survey [1], reveals the views of prescribing ophthalmology physicians in Canada on product identification, prescribing biologicals and prescribing biosimilars and switching.
Ophthalmology biosimilars in Canada: a prescriber’s perspective
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 15/09/2023 0 Post your comment
In 2022, the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines and the International Federation on Ageing conducted a web-based quantitative survey of 41 participants practicing ophthalmology in Canada. Prescribers were asked for their views: on how products are identified; influence of the cost of biologicals and biosimilars when prescribing; prescribing biosimilars and switching to biosimilars; pharmacist-level switching to biosimilars and automatic substitution of biosimilars.
Overall, the survey revealed information about how the physicians record and identify biological/biosimilar drug products (product identification). It also demonstrates that ophthalmologists are confident in the Canadian pharmacovigilance system’s ability to accurately identify the specific product at the brand-name level that might be responsible for an adverse drug reaction. In addition, most physicians are not influenced by the cost when prescribing biologicals and they are confident prescribing biosimilars and switching patients to biosimilars where appropriate. The survey also highlights that prescribers hold patient education and support programmes in high regard.
Regarding switching (by pharmacists or payers), physicians believe it is crucial for them to have the authority to designate a biological medicine as ‘DISPENSE AS WRITTEN’ or ‘DO NOT SUBSTITUTE’. They voiced the desire to be informed when pharmacists dispense biologicals that differ to those prescribed. Overall, 90% of practitioners said they think they should have the sole authority to decide what biological is dispensed to patients and over 80% said they are not comfortable with third-party switching for non-medical reasons. Most practitioners were in support of a system that would offer multiple products that are reimbursed, including innovator and biosimilars, they also supported biosimilars being encouraged for new patients and no automatic substitution.
Related articles
Biosimilar launches in Canada and US: Byooviz and Stimufend
American Academy of Ophthalmology biosimilars guidance details
Byooviz: first ophthalmology biosimilar launches in US
LATIN AMERICAN FORUM View the latest headline article: Biosimilares oftalmológicos en Canadá: la perspectiva de un prescriptor Browse the news in the Latin American Forum! Register to receive the GaBI Latin American Forum newsletter. Inform colleagues and friends of this new initiative.
FORO LATINOAMERICANO Ver el último artículo de cabecera: Biosimilares oftalmológicos en Canadá: la perspectiva de un prescriptor !Explore las noticias en el Foro Latinoamericano! Regístrese para recibir el boletín informativo GaBI Foro Latinoamericano. Informe a colegas y amigos sobre esta nueva iniciativa. |
Reference
1. Reilly MS, Barratt J. Canadian prescribers' attitudes and perceptions about ophthalmic biosimilars. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal (GaBI Journal). 2023;12(2):41-9. doi:10.5639/gabij.2023.1202.009
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2023 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
General
Humira's resilience in the face of biosimilar competition
Boehringer Ingelheim to expand access to adalimumab biosimilar
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Efficacy and safety of the proposed P043 (Zerafil) vs reference omalizumab in allergic asthma
Comments (0)
Post your comment