In Canada, policies to switch patients to biosimilars were introduced in several provinces, including Alberta, British Colombia and Ontario, in 2020 [2]. However, while drug policy experts and some rheumatologists are praising the adoption of these policies that favour biosimilars, others have concerns about non-medical switching of stable patients.

On this subject, authors from Canada discussed whether biosimilars have kept the promises that they appear to make [3]. They start with the statement that biosimilars have promised to reduce treatment costs to ensure that more patients have access to these therapies without impacting the sustainability of the healthcare system. However, they find that there is no public oversight that confirms that these promises have been kept and that the actual price of the biosimilars themselves is reduced, rather than the savings being achieved by curtailing patient support programs (PSPs). Based on this situation, healthcare professionals (HCPs) must ensure well-developed and effective PSPs are set in place by manufacturers to ensure patient care is the priority.

They add that HCPs should call for attention to all involved stakeholders about the need for the off-label use of biosimilars in medical practice to ensure patients have access to them. Finally, they recommend that HCPs request provincial post-implementation surveillance to assess ongoing responses to biosimilar policies.

The authors end by stating that vigilance and action are needed to ensure that promises are met.

Conflict of interest
The authors of the research paper [3] reported conflict of interest, including having received funding from pharmaceutical companies. For full details of the authors’ conflict of interest, see the research paper [3].

Abstracted by Sylvia A Martinez-Cabriales, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Department of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Editor’s comment
Readers interested to learn more about substitution policies for biosimilars in Canada are invited to visit www.gabi-journal.net to view the following manuscript published in GaBI Journal:

A critical review of substitution policy for biosimilars in Canada

GaBI Journal is indexed in Embase, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index and more.

Readers interested in contributing a research or perspective paper to GaBI Journal – an independent, peer reviewed academic journal – please send us your submission here.

GaBI Journal Citation Impact
1.9 – CiteScore 2020 (calculated on 5 May 2021)
2.1 – CiteScoreTracker 2021 (Last updated on 4 November 2021)

Submit a manuscript to GaBI Journal

Related article
Law and ethics of switching to biosimilars in Canada

References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Tailored and reduced clinical programme for biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2021 Nov 19]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/reports/Tailored-and-reduced-clinical-programme-for-biosimilars
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Ontario becomes third Canadian province to switch patients to biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2021 Nov 19]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/biosimilars/general/Ontario-becomes-third-Canadian-province-to-switch-patients-to-biosimilars
3. Martinez-Cabriales SA, Manion R, Shear NH. Biosimilars: Promises Made. Promises Kept? J Cutan Med Surg. 2021;25(3):241-42.

Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.

Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2021 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.