A study of long-term follow-up data after switching to biosimilar infliximab appears to show identical retention rates, according to French researchers [1].
Long-term follow-up of switching to biosimilar infliximab
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 11/01/2019 0 Post your comment
Data supporting the safety and efficacy of switching to infliximab biosimilars is already available [2]. In particular, Norway’s infliximab switching study (NOR‑SWITCH), a 52-week, randomized, double-blind trial, strongly supports the efficacy and safety of the switch from originator infliximab (Remicade) to the biosimilar infliximab CT‑P13 in patients with stable disease [3]. However, according to Vincent Germain and colleagues from rheumatology departments in Bordeaux, France, long-term follow-up data are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of the switch.
Therefore, the authors assessed the long-term retention rate of infliximab biosimilar CT‑P13 after switching from originator infliximab (Remicade) and compared it with the retention rate observed in a historic cohort of patients treated with Remicade from a previous study carried out by the same group.
In their previous real-life study, the authors demonstrated a high acceptance of 89% (89/100) and a 72% (64/89) retention rate after a median follow-up of 33 weeks in a cohort of patients with stable rheumatic diseases switched from Remicade to CT‑P13.
In the present study, in the switch cohort, 50/89 (56%) patients were still treated with CT‑P13 after a median follow-up of 120 weeks. Among the 39 withdrawals, 25 (64%) patients discontinued CT‑P13 during the first period of follow-up, whereas 14 (36%) patients discontinued CT‑P13 later. Reasons for stopping CT‑P13 belatedly were: an objective clinical worsening in 5/14 patients, non-serious safety issues in 6/14 patients (psoriatic lesions, digestive disorders, asthenia and subjective neurological symptoms with negative extensive investigations) and stable remission in 3/14 patients. No case of subjective clinical worsening was observed during the second period of the follow-up.
Treatment retention rates were 67% (55/82) for originator infliximab in the historic cohort after a median follow-up of 131 weeks. There was a statistical trend towards more withdrawals in the switch population compared with the historic cohort, as assessed by the log-rank analysis (p = 0.052). After excluding patients without worsening objective clinical activity, this statistical trend faded (log-rank p = 0.673). The authors noted that, interestingly, infliximab retention rates were similar between the switch and the historic cohort when starting the analysis from the end of the first study (log-rank p = 0.708).
According to Germain et al., ‘these results suggest that a nocebo effect may occur in the first weeks after the switch and initially lowers the biosimilar retention rate’. This say the authors has also been ‘demonstrated in previous studies’. After this initial nocebo effect, Remicade and CT‑P13 retention rates ‘appear to be identical, confirming the safety, efficacy and acceptability of the switch in the long term’.
The authors conclude that ‘initial information provided before the switch appears to be crucial for biosimilar acceptance and therefore reducing the nocebo effect’. They add that ‘Patient and physician information on long-term efficacy and safety of biosimilars are consequently a major need to enhance their widespread use’.
Conflict of interest
Several of the authors of the research paper [1] reported conflict of interest, including having received honoraria from various pharmaceutical companies and having received a research grant from Pfizer. For full details of the authors’ conflict of interest, see the research paper [1].
Related article
Biosimilars of infliximab
References
1. Germain V, Scherlinger M, Barnetche T, et al. Long-term follow-up after switching from originator infliximab to its biosimilar CT-P13: the weight of nocebo effect. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct 23. pii: annrheumdis-2018-214374
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Clinical and real-world data for switching to biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Jan 11]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/Research/Clinical-and-real-world-data-for-switching-to-biosimilars
3. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. NOR-SWITCH study finds biosimilar infliximab not inferior to originator [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Jan 11]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/Research/NOR-SWITCH-study-finds-biosimilar-infliximab-not-inferior-to-originator
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2019 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment