Australia’s drug regulatory agency, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), announced on 28 July 2017 that it was opening a consultation on how to name biologicals.
Australia’s TGA consults on naming of biologicals
Biosimilars/General | Posted 01/09/2017 0 Post your comment
The agency has launched public consultation in order to gather feedback on proposals for potential biological naming systems.
In its specific guidance for biosimilars [1] the TGA requires that the name of a biosimilar in Australia be made up of:
- the reference product ABN (Australian Biological Name), thus identifying the reference product with which the biosimilar has demonstrable comparability, and
- a biosimilar identifier, consisting of: the prefix sim(a)- and a three-letter code issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Committee, according to its draft policy.
However, in order to provide improvements in the identification of biologicals in the reporting of adverse events and to align with international practice the agency is seeking comment on changing this approach. With respect to alignment the agency does, however, note ‘the significantly different approaches adopted by Europe and the US’.
The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) biologicals naming guidance requires biosimilars and their reference products to have distinguishable non-proprietary names. The FDA approach is to assign a random, meaningless suffix containing four letters to all biologicals to facilitate pharmacovigilance [2]. The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) approach on the other hand is to use 2D barcoding on product packaging in order to trace the batch number and identity of all medicines (including biologicals). It has also been pointed out that biosimilars using the same INN as their reference products have been on the market in Europe since 2006 with a proven safety record, and there have been no issues with traceability or pharmacovigilance [3].
The TGA is seeking comments from interested parties on proposed options on whether there is a need in Australia for additional naming requirements for biologicals as a way of strengthening traceability and pharmacovigilance.
The agency has proposed four options for the public to comment on:
1. No change to the current system.
2. Keep the current system, but with activities that increase public reporting of adverse events with the inclusion of the product’s trade name, AUST R and batch number.
3. Move towards adopting a barcode system similar to the EU.
4. Introduce the use of suffixes to the naming of biologicals – in a similar way to the system implemented in the US.
Comments can be submitted to the TGA via its online consultation submission form, which is available at www.tga.gov.au/consultation/consultation-nomenclature-biological-medicines. The consultation closes on 8 September 2017 and feedback will be released after agency ‘consideration of submissions’.
Related article
WHO naming of biosimilars
References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Naming requirements in Australian biosimilars guidance [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/Naming-requirements-in-Australian-biosimilars-guidance
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA issues final guidance on naming biologicals [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/FDA-issues-final-guidance-on-naming-biologicals
3. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Fight continues over biosimilar naming standards [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Fight-continues-over-biosimilar-naming-standards
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2017 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: TGA
Research
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Comments (0)
Post your comment