Whether or not the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permits automatic substitution of biosimilars, healthcare systems can still consider using formularies as a way to increase the use of more affordable biosimilars [1].
Use of formularies could increase use of biosimilars
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 14/02/2014 0 Post your comment
The formulary tool of therapeutic interchange can be used to exchange therapeutic alternatives according to approved written guidelines or protocols within a formulary system.
Therapeutic interchange programmes are already in place for a variety of biologicals. For example, in the case of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), automatic interchange programmes exist that convert orders for multiple ESA products to orders for a single ESA. This simplifies the formulary and consolidates the market share of one product in order to improve contracting and lower overall costs. Similar systems are also in place for human insulin and intravenous immune globulin.
Criteria that should be considered when setting up a therapeutic interchange programme include:
- Including products considered therapeutically equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy
- Potential savings to be made
- Developing a clear process for interchange
- Prescribers having sufficient knowledge and understanding of the products
- The ability to ‘opt out’ under certain circumstances
- The ability to assess the outcomes of therapy with the different products
In order to assure the appropriate use of biosimilars formulary management the following factors should also be considered:
- Data on efficacy and safety
- Indications
- Potential for immunogenicity
- Appropriate naming and labelling
- Pharmacovigilance plan
- The need for physician and patient education
Payers will undoubtedly provide significant incentives to use biosimilars in order to reduce costs. These may include significant co-payment or co-insurance premiums for use of an originator product when a biosimilar is available. Pharmacists will therefore need to be aware of both FDA and state laws when determining whether substitution is possible.
Conflict of interest
The authors of the research paper [1] declared that there were no conflicts of interest.
Editor’s comment
If you are interested in contributing a research paper inGaBI Journal, please send us your submission here.
If you would like to receive a PDF copy* of the Lucio article [1], please send us an email.
*For profit organizations subjected to a fee
Related articles
US state legislation on biosimilars substitution
Efficacy, extrapolation and interchangeability of biosimilars
Biosimilar substitution in the EU
Reference
1. Lucio SD, Stevenson JG, Hoffman JM. Biosimilars: implications for health-system pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(22):2004-17.
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2014 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment