Switching between reference biologicals and biosimilars can be a contentious issue. A study from Italy, however, has found that this phenomenon is not limited to reference products and their biosimilars, but also often occurs between originator biologicals and other originator biologicals within the same category [1].
Switching between different ESAs
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 27/05/2016 0 Post your comment
Carmen D’Amore and colleagues carried out a retrospective drug utilization study to investigate the occurrence of switching between different erythropoiesis stimulating agents in the Umbria region of Italy.
The study included 3,258 subjects who received their first epoetin prescription over the 4-year period between 1 July 2011 and 31 December 2014. Among the 2,896 patients with at least two prescriptions, 354 (12.2%) experienced one or more switches. The probability of switching depended on the duration of treatment: approximately 15% of users switched within 12 months of observation and 25% switched within 2 years.
Switching was not limited to reference and biosimilar epoetins and it affected patent and off-patent epoetins equally. When switched from the reference epoetin, the majority of subjects (61.8%) received another patented epoetin and 38.2% received a biosimilar epoetin. Initial users of other patented epoetins were mainly shifted to a different product within the same category (67.1%).
The authors found that the practice of switching mainly concerns drugs that have not undergone the direct comparability testing that is carried out before marketing a biosimilar. They therefore conclude that ‘when taken together with other sources of comparative evidence’ these data ‘may provide reassurance to physicians regarding the substitution of reference with biosimilar epoetins’.
Conflict of interest
The authors of the research paper [1] declared that there were no conflicts of interest.
Editor’s comment
Readers interested to learn more about switching to biosimilars are invited to visit www.gabi-journal.net to view the following manuscript published in GaBI Journal:
Weighing up the cost of switching to biosimilars
Readers interested in contributing a research or perspective paper to GaBI Journal – an independent, peer reviewed academic journal platform – please send us your submission here.
Related article
BSG guidance recommends switching to biosimilar infliximab
Reference
1. D’Amore C, Da Cas R, Rossi M, Traversa G. Switching between epoetins: a practice in support of biosimilar use. BioDrugs. 2016;30(1):27-32.
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2016 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment