US-based biosimilars developer Coherus BioSciences (Coherus) announced on 1 October 2015 that results from a phase I study of its pegfilgrastim biosimilar (CHS‑1701) had met its primary endpoint.
Positive phase I results for pegfilgrastim biosimilar
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 16/10/2015 0 Post your comment
The aims of the phase I trial were to study the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety (including immunogenicity) of Coherus’s biosimilar (CHS-1701) compared to Amgen’s neutropenia* treatment Neulasta (pegfilgrastim). The trial is a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 2-period crossover study in healthy patients. All patients received a single 6 mg subcutaneous injection of CHS-1701 and a single 6 mg subcutaneous injection of Neulasta.
A total of 116 healthy volunteer subjects were randomized to one of two treatment sequences; Neulasta (Period 1) then CHS-1701 (Period 2) or CHS-1701 (Period 1) then Neulasta (Period 2).
The study met its primary PD endpoint of absolute neutrophil count (ANC). In terms of PK parameters, the study also met bioequivalence for Cmax. The area under the curve (AUC) portion of the PK results are still under review.
All four treatment groups performed as expected and the study met both PD endpoint measures of absolute neutrophil count (ANCmax and ANC AUC). For PK, three of the four treatment groups, which included both of the CHS-1701 treatment groups and the Period 2 Neulasta group, performed as expected. The PK maximum concentration (Cmax) endpoint of the study met bioequivalence. A low, anomalous PK profile in the Period 1 Neulasta group resulted in not meeting bioequivalence in the area-under-the-curve (AUC) endpoints (AUC0-to-288, AUC0-to-Inf, AUCLast). Coherus, in collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration, is investigating the root cause of this anomalous result.
In terms of any drug-related adverse events, the safety profile was equivalent between the CHS-1701 and Neulasta treatment arms, and no neutralizing antibodies were identified in either treatment cohort.
Coherus is also carrying out another phase I trial with its biosimilar pegfilgrastim candidate (CHS-1701) to assess immunogenicity in healthy patients, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.
Given these overall positive results, Coherus believes that it remains on track for its planned filing for approval of its pegfilgrstim biosimilar in the first quarter of 2016.
*Neutropenia is a lack of certain white blood cells caused by cancer chemotherapy
Related article
Coherus starts phase III biosimilar etanercept trial
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2015 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment