The terms of approval for every biosimilar and its reference product must be made clearer, argue the European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises (EBE) [1]. The development of biosimilar regulatory pathways worldwide has been led by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [2], but EMA’s information-driven stepwise approach is only reflected in a single section of the product labelling for healthcare professionals and patients, which so far has followed a generic approach in Europe.
Improved labelling sought for biosimilar acceptance
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 31/10/2014 0 Post your comment
EBE has set out a proposal for transparency concerning evidence generated for these products. A new approach to biosimilar and reference product labelling would ensure more informed clinical use and generate trust in these important medicines.
EBE recommends a combination of information on each biosimilar and its reference product [1]. To achieve this, they argue, greater dialogue is needed between EMA, the Biosimilar Medicinal Products Working Party (BMWP), industry, opinion leaders, and patients.
The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is the most widely used reference document for physicians. The ‘Guideline on summary of product characteristics’ provides instructions on what needs to be detailed in the SmPC, for all products including biosimilars, but further discussion on detailed specific guidance for biosimilars is needed.
BMWP has discussed the structure of the SmPC in relation to biosimilars. One option they have considered is identical labelling for both the biosimilar and its reference product. Differential product labelling could suggest a difference between the biosimilar and reference product, BMWP noted, potentially leading prescribers to conclude that biosimilars do not require the same level of evidence as their reference products.
EBE acknowledges these concerns, but contend that the SmPC would be better served if it were represented by a combination of information from both the biosimilar and the reference product if the label is different.
Consistency and transparency of biosimilar labels will lead to a better understanding and acceptance of these products with all stakeholders, EBE concludes.
References
1. European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises. Tell me the whole story: the role of product labelling in building user confidence in biosimilars in Europe. Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal (GaBI Journal). 2014;3(4):188-92. doi:10.5639/gabij.2014.0304.043
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. EU publishes consensus report on biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2014 Oct 31]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Reports/EU-publishes-consensus-report-on-biosimilars
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2014 Pro PharmaCommunications International. All Rights Reserved.
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment