The economic effects of the possible introduction of follow-on protein products have been the subject of recent debate. In a study by Mr Michael Lanthier, Ms Rachel Behrman and Mr Clark Nardinelli of the US FDA, it was aimed to explore the economic issues surrounding this debate using three measures: total sales, product complexity and patent expiry.
Economic issues with follow-on protein products
Biosimilars/Research
|
Posted 30/07/2009
0
Post your comment

Their analysis shows that the sales of therapeutic protein products are concentrated in a relatively small number of branded products, which may be the most attractive targets for follow-on development. Many of these products are complex proteins that are reported to have patent coverage for several more years.
However, if reported patent expiration estimates hold, in the not-too-distant future, a significant number of important protein products with large current sales will lose patent protection. For the years 2013–2015, they estimate that products representing US$20 billion (Euros 14.3 billion) in annual sales – approximately half of all sales in 2006 – can be expected to lose patent protection.
The majority of the products were licensed under the Public Health Service Act, which lacks an abbreviated pathway for approval of follow-on products, creating uncertainty for potential developers of follow-on products.
Source: Nature Reviews 7;2008:733.
News
January 2025 biosimilar approvals in Europe
EC approves eight biosimilars, eight more await final authorization
General
Biologicals and biosimilars available for IBD in Canada
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
Positive safety and efficacy primary endpoint results for AVT05 (golimumab proposed biosimilar)

Biosimilars/Research Posted 28/01/2025
Pertuzumab biosimilar HLX11 meets primary endpoint in phase III comparative clinical study

Biosimilars/Research Posted 03/12/2024
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets

Post your comment