Biosimilars or follow-on biologics (FOBs) are biopharmaceuticals that, unlike small molecule generic products, are copies of larger, much more complex proteins. As such, data generated from one biopharmaceutical cannot be extrapolated to another. Unlike small molecule generics, FOBs require a full developmental programme, albeit smaller than for an originator product. This has been recognized by European regulatory authorities and it is becoming clear that accelerated processes for FOB marketing approval are not feasible.
Biosimilars: it is not as simple as cost alone
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 29/07/2009 0 Post your comment
Simon D Roger and D Goldsmith of the Gosford Hospital in Gosford, Australia, tried to determine the balance between costs surrounding FOBs (including relatively extensive developmental programmes and subsequent price to the market) and the necessity to ensure efficacy and safety.
Their principal findings were that it is important that FOBs are sufficiently tested to ensure patient safety is not compromised. Conducting such a development programme followed by sound pharmacovigilance is very challenging and costly. They concluded that cost-savings associated with FOBs may be limited.
Source: J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Oct;33(5):459-64.
General
Biosimilar medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia
SBR issues consensus on interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Long-term real-world safety experience of biosimilars confirms concept of biosimilarity
Budget impact analysis of Rixathon introduction in Chile for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: are we ready for multiple switches
Topline results from clinical development programme for candidate biosimilar AVT05 golimumab
Comments (0)
Post your comment