Biosimilars/Research
Non-originator low molecular weight heparins: generics or biosimilars
First developed in the 1980s, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are complex anticoagulants derived from porcine intestinal mucosa and are used in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Heparin sodium’s anticoagulant activity is mainly governed by its ability to bind to the serine protease inhibitor antithrombin (AT). In this sense, heparin sodium functions as a cofactor for AT by modifying its conformation, thereby accelerating the inactivation of clotting factors.
Positive phase I results for adalimumab biosimilar
In an announcement on 28 October 2015, biopharmaceutical specialist Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (Boehringer Ingelheim) claimed that results from a phase I study of its adalimumab biosimilar (BI 695501) had ‘demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence’ to Humira (adalimumab).
Biosimilar naming and AE reporting
How will biosimilar naming affect the ability to attribute adverse events (AEs) to a particular product? This is a question researchers from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) sought to answer [1].
Rituximab biosimilar claimed similar pharmacokinetics to originator
A phase I/II study of Pfizer’s rituximab biosimilar candidate PF-05280586 has shown similar pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, according to Jacobs and co-authors [1].
Biosimilars use in Italy increasing
A study of the use of biosimilars in four large Italian geographic areas has found that the use of biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), especially in naïve patients, increased significantly during the years 2009–2013 [1].
Positive phase I results for pegfilgrastim biosimilar
US-based biosimilars developer Coherus BioSciences (Coherus) announced on 1 October 2015 that results from a phase I study of its pegfilgrastim biosimilar (CHS‑1701) had met its primary endpoint.
Answers to questions about anti-TNF biosimilars
While the potential pharmacoeconomic benefits of cost-effective biosimilars seem clear, several issues have been raised regarding, for example, the definition of biosimilarity and the validity of indication extrapolation, as well as the ‘switchability’ and relative immunogenicity of biosimilars and their reference drugs. In a review by Isaacs and co-authors, these questions with reference to CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra), a biosimilar of the anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody infliximab (Remicade) were discussed [1].
Biosimilar epoetin-α as effective as originator in anaemia treatment
A study by researchers in Italy has concluded that biosimilar epoetin‑α appears to be comparable to originator epoetin‑α plus liposomal iron (Sideral), vitamin B12 and folates in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of refractory anaemia [1].
Positive phase III results for bevacizumab biosimilar
Results of a phase III trial have demonstrated the similarity of partners Amgen and Allergan’s biosimilar bevacizumab candidate (ABP 215) to Avastin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Pharmacoeconomic modelling of biosimilars in the US
There are many challenges and uncertainties associated with the introduction of biosimilars to the US. To try and address these, authors from the Partnership for Health Analytic Research developed a conceptual framework to provide guidance in modelling biosimilars in the US setting [1].
