Biosimilars/Research
Mandatory and non-mandatory switching for biosimilars
Glintborg and co-authors responded to the comments made by Marc Scherlinger and Thierry Schaeverbeke on their paper ‘To switch or not to switch’, which reported the results of biosimilar etanercept switching in Denmark [1].
Positive phase III results for rituximab biosimilar CT-P10
Celltrion has presented positive phase III results for its rituximab biosimilar CT‑P10 at the American Society of Hematology Meeting (ASH) annual meeting.
Biosimilar teriparatide approved for the treatment of osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is a modern day epidemic longevity has brought about and represents an enormous socioeconomic burden. Being largely asymptomatic the silent thief can get away with insidiously stealing the patient’s bones until, as a result of the relentless bone loss, fragility fractures inevitably occur. The first, so-called sentinel fracture is the forerunner of the devastating fracture cascade as any prior fracture translates into a two- to four-fold increase in the risk of sustaining a subsequent one within one year [1].
Positive phase III results for rituximab biosimilar ABP 798
Biotech giant Amgen, and its partner Allergan, announced on 24 January 2019 positive data from a phase I/III study of its rituximab biosimilar (ABP 798) compared to Rituxan (rituximab).
Questions over DANBIO relevance for non-medical switching
Italian rheumatologists Fabrizio Cantini and Maurizio Benucci commented on the paper from Glintborg and co-authors ‘To switch or not to switch’, which reported the results of biosimilar etanercept switching in Denmark [1].
Long-term stability of trastuzumab biosimilar under various storage conditions
Trastuzumab (TTZ) is a monoclonal antibody that interferes with the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In some cancers, including certain types of breast cancers and gastric cancers, HER2 is overexpressed, causing cancer cells to reproduce uncontrollably. TTZ can be used in the management of these cancers.
Barriers and facilitators to biosimilar prescribing in the UK
At present, the rate of uptake of biosimilars is keenly debated among stakeholders in different healthcare specialties. Aladul et al. examined the perspectives on biosimilars among healthcare professionals (HCPs) from gastroenterology, rheumatology and diabetes specialities to shed light on barriers and facilitators to their prescribing in the UK [1]. In a qualitative, cross-sectional study, 22 HCPs (consultants, nurses and pharmacists) from five hospitals in the West Midlands were interviewed.
Liability chain of biosimilar switching
When an adverse event to a medicinal product, or a loss of efficacy, is experienced by a patient, the liability chain may potentially involve both the manufacturer and/or Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) (products liability) and the healthcare professionals responsible for prescribing, dispensing and/or administrating (professional liability) the medicine.
Biosimilars - to switch or not to switch
Authors Marc Scherlinger and Thierry Schaeverbeke commented on the paper from Glintborg and co-authors ‘To switch or not to switch’ ,which reported the results of biosimilar etanercept switching in Denmark [1].
EMA continues to be open to alternative clinical development strategies for biosimilars
In the European Union (EU) and other highly regulated markets, companies need to prove the similarity of proposed biosimilars to the established reference product for gaining market authorization. European regulators recommend using a stepwise approach whose first steps consist of a demonstration of similarity at the analytical level and via non-clinical studies. In addition, as a later step, clinical studies are an important source of additional evidence.
