At the 17th Biosimilar Medicines Conference, the World Health Organization (WHO) outlined the first results for their pilot project for the prequalification of two cancer drug biosimilars.
WHO prequalification for rituximab and trastuzumab: first results
Home/Reports | Posted 26/04/2019 0 Post your comment
WHO’s prequalification programme was first established in 2001 and offers guidance on the acceptability of medical products (including drugs, vaccines, diagnostics and medical devices) ahead of their procurement to UN (United Nation) agencies and WHO Member States. As of 2012, there were over 300 medicines on the WHO List of Prequalified Medicinal Products.
All prequalified products must meet WHO technical guidance on quality, safety and efficacy, and be compliant with WHO standards on good practices (including Good Manufacturing Practice, Good Laboratory Practice and Good Clinical Practice).
WHO announced the pilot for prequalifying biosimilars in May 2017 [1]. The Organization invited manufacturers to submit applications for prequalification of biosimilars of rituximab, used to treat non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and leukaemia, and trastuzumab, which is sold under the brand name Herceptin and is a popular treatment option for breast cancer.
At the 17th Biosimilar Medicines Conference, held on 29 March 2019 in The Netherlands, Director of Regulation of Medicines and other Health Technologies (RHT) Emer Cooke confirmed that the pilot for the prequalification of these drugs launched in June 2018. Rituximab and trastuzumab are among the first monoclonal antibody therapies to be listed in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines.
Cooke outlined two assessment pathways for the biosimilars. The full assessment pathway applies to biosimilars that have been registered by non-stringent regulatory authorities (SRAs), using an SRA-approved reference drug as comparator and for marketing in the country of registration. Under the abridged assessment pathway, originator products or biosimilars for rituximab and trastuzumab have been approved by an SRA and marketed in the country of the SRA.
As of February 2019, 18 dossiers have been received by WHO, divided equally between the two assessment pathways. Assessors and inspectors have been nominated from 10 countries spanning Africa and Asia, and Europe.
The outcome of all the abridged assessments has been communicated by WHO, while pre-submission meetings have been held for all applications made under the full assessment pathway.
The presentation also highlighted a number of issues observed during the application process so far. In the full assessment pathway, for example, Emer Cooke noted that data contained in the dossiers was in many cases insufficient to demonstrate similarity between the reference product and the biosimilar (in terms of quality, safety and efficacy).
For the abridged pathway, Cooke said applicants have not adapted their dossiers to patient treatment and current clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries (for example, in terms of pharmacovigilance and handling complaints).
Related article
WHO releases Q&A on biosimilars evaluation
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. WHO to launch prequalification programme for biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Apr 26]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/WHO-to-launch-prequalification-programme-for-biosimilars
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2019 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Guidelines
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
New regulations in Brazil for the registration of biosimilars
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Comments (0)
Post your comment