What is the possibility of international harmonization for biosimilars? EMA Head of Biologicals Dr Peter Richardson and Amgen Director of Value, Access and Policy Mr Thomas Moore speak to BioCentury about this issue, as well as why the US is still lagging behind Europe in the biosimilars race.
International harmonization for biosimilars
Home/Reports | Posted 28/06/2013 0 Post your comment
Dr Richardson outlines the philosophy of EMA as being to reduce the clinical and non-clinical requirements for approval of biosimilars in Europe, without compromising quality and safety. However, the licensing requirements for biosimilars have demanded that in order to gain approval in the EU, the reference product for a biosimilar application had to be licensed in the EU. This has therefore forced companies to carry out clinical studies in Europe.
EMA has been working closely with FDA in order to evolve a more open practice of where the clinical trial is carried out and whether it could be possible for the trial to be in the US or Europe and that the data would still be sufficient for a biosimilar application in the EU. In fact, one proposal in EMA’s new draft overarching biosimilars guideline is that EMA will accept the use of a non-EEA authorized comparator or reference product [1]. EMA has also been working with the World Health Organization on global harmonization.
Global trials for biosimilars are an important issue for Amgen. As pointed out by Mr Moore, if done right they would help streamline operating expenses, thus reducing costs, which would hopefully be passed on to payers and patients. He also pointed out that it would be critical that any confidential data that the regulatory authority might have access to for approval of a biosimilar would not be shared with other applicants.
In the EU, a legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003, followed by guidelines and the approval of the first biosimilar Omnitrope (somatropin) in 2006. In the US, it has been three years since a legislative pathway was put in place for biosimilars and FDA is yet to receive its first application. One reason for this was suggested to be that patents on the originator biologicals expired earlier in Europe compared to the US. Mr Moore also added that there is a high degree of interest in biosimilars in the US and with expiring patents in the US, companies are still deciding which pathway is the best to use.
Related articles
Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies and pharmacovigilance in Europe
Possibility of substitution of biosimilars in Europe
EMA’s Richardson talks about biosimilars in Europe
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. EMA issues draft revision of overarching biosimilar guidelines [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2013 Jun 28]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/EMA-issues-draft-revision-of-overarching-biosimilar-guidelines
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2013 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Guidelines
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
New regulations in Brazil for the registration of biosimilars
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Comments (0)
Post your comment