A legal framework for approving biosimilars in the EU was established in 2003 and guidelines for an abbreviated registration process were issued in 2006. However, acceptance and use of biosimilars within Europe varies by country.
Biosimilars use in Europe
Home/Reports | Posted 25/11/2011 2 Post your comment
The European legal framework means that biosimilars can only be approved centrally via EMA and not nationally. EMA, however, does not make any decision on interchangeability of biosimilars for the originator product; this is made at a national level.
EMA approved the first biosimilar for somatropin (Omnitrope) back in 2006. To date the agency has approved 14 biosimilars for use in the EU, within the product classes of human growth hormone (HGH), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and erythropoietin [1].
Some countries, however, have seen only a minor adoption of these biosimilars while others now have biosimilars accounting for the majority of market share for certain therapeutic categories.
Countries with high acceptance of biosimilars include Austria, Germany and Sweden. Germany, in fact, has some of the highest market shares in Europe based upon the implementation of quotas for biosimilar prescribing by physicians, see Table 1. UK, on the other hand, while it has relatively low acceptance of HGH and erythropoietin biosimilars, has the highest level of G-CSF use in Europe.
Table 1: Use of biosimilars in Europe
Country | Biosimilar share of originator sales (March 2011) | ||
HGH (Q2 2006)* One biosimilar |
Erythropoietin (Q3 2007)* Five biosimilars |
G-CSF (Q3 2008)* Six biosimilars |
|
Austria | 6% | 50% | 52% |
France | 20% | 11% | 42% |
Germany | 12% | 65% | 45% |
Greece | N/A | 67% | 53% |
Italy | 12% | 7% | 18% |
Poland | 7% | 62% | 38% |
Romania | 34% | 58% | 77% |
Spain | 15% | 16% | 24% |
Sweden | 21% | 63% | 45% |
UK | 4% | 9% | 80% |
EU total | 13% | 18% | 38% |
*EU approval date; HGH: human growth hormone; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; N/A: not applicable.
Source: IMS MIDAS//MTA Global Database: March 2011, Monthly Sales, Units
It is clearly understood that biosimilars cannot directly substitute the originator products. However, EMA sets high standards for safety and efficacy, which should reassure clinicians and enable them to prescribe biosimilars instead of the originator products.
Erythropoietin biosimilars lead the way as their effects are visible immediately and uptake is therefore good in many countries. One reason for the low uptake of HGH biosimilars in most countries could be due to the fact that it is given primarily to children and effects are visible only over the longer term, so tolerance of risk and reduced efficacy may be lower.
Related article
Market opportunities for biosimilars
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Biosimilars approved in Europe [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2011 November 25]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Biosimilars-approved-in-Europe
Source: Novation
Posted 05/08/2013 by Jodi H, GaBI Online Editorial Office
Response to ‘Quota for biosimilars prescribing will be key driver in increasing biosimilar uptake’
Dear Dr Pramanik,
Thank you for your comment. Please note that we will soon publish such an article in GaBI Journal. Please visit www.gabi-journal.net to keep a look out for upcoming manuscript topics.
Best regards,
Jodi
Posted 10/07/2013 by Kallal Pramanik, PhD
Quota for biosimilars prescribing will be key driver in increasing biosimilar uptake
The quota's on biosimilar prescribing will be one of the key driver for increasing biosimilar uptake. Can anyone shed more light on prevalence of such quota system in European countries. One article on such topic will be very interesting.
Guidelines
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
New regulations in Brazil for the registration of biosimilars
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Comments (2)
Post your comment