Although the Biologics Price Competition Act was passed in 2009, progress has been slow in setting up a route by which companies can apply to license biosimilars in the US.
Slow progress towards biosimilar approval in US
Home/Policies & Legislation
|
Posted 25/02/2011
0
Post your comment

In November 2010, FDA held public hearings to set in motion a consultation on how the legislation should be implemented. The new system, once it has been developed in the light of these representations, will operate from 2013 to 2017. Would-be contributors had until 10 January 2011 to indicate their desire to contribute to the discussion. FDA is required to report back to Congress by 15 January 2012.
Europe leads the way
While the US is still struggling the EU is already moving ahead on how to deal with large-molecule biosimilars. EMA first brought out umbrella guidelines for biosimilars in 2005. A series of product-specific draft guidelines were released for consultation in March 2010. Two consultations on monoclonal antibodies are running until 31 May 2011. A series of guidelines for biomedicinal products will be finalised during this year.
In recent years, EMA and FDA have been working more closely. The FDA guidelines are therefore likely to follow the EMA’s for the most part, although there will probably be some areas of significant difference. The most talked about is the period of exclusivity. In Europe, innovators have a 10-year data exclusivity period, whereas the US legislation allows for a 12-year period of exclusivity, with a further six months available if paediatric clinical trials are conducted. Canada, by contrast, allows only a six-year exclusivity period.
Experience is being gained in Europe
The long-awaited guidelines pave the way for cheaper copies of very expensive medicines used to treat cancer and other serious diseases. The requirements will be intermediate in stringency between those for a normal generic drug and for the originator biological, with a price tag to match. Europe has accepted that these products will be safe, although not interchangeable like small generic molecules. Some simpler biopharmaceuticals are already in use, and Teva is already running trials for its biosimilar version of rituximab (Roche’s MabThera). Once the US establishes its rules for marketing authorisation, a number of manufacturers will be ready with biosimilars already being used in Europe.
Related article
Source: EMA, Pharmcast, Stockhouse, Yahoo Health.
Guidelines
FDA issues guidance on AI use in drug and biologicals regulatory decision making
ICH adopts Good Clinical Practice Guideline for clinical trials
Reports
FTC reveals extent of PBM drug mark-ups and profits
Latin American patients face 4.7-year wait for innovative treatments
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 05/11/2024
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 18/09/2024
China’s NMPA expands global ties with the Netherlands and Indonesia

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 04/09/2024
Japan's PMDA expands influence with new office in Thailand

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 06/08/2024
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets

Post your comment