Both EMA and FDA are increasing their requirements for stability testing, especially for generic drugs. These changes could significantly increase the length of time required to gain regulatory approval and increase costs for generics manufacturers to get their drugs onto the market.
New stability testing rules for generics
Home/Policies & Legislation
|
Posted 28/10/2011
0
Post your comment

EMA issued new draft guidelines in August 2011 on stability testing required to support a variation to a marketing authorisation. Under the new rules, additional data must be submitted to accompany major, type II variations, such as a change in batch size or switching suppliers. The draft document is posted on the EMA website.
FDA announced on 4 October 2011 that it will soon require generic drugmakers to submit 12 months of product stability data with abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs)—four times as long as currently mandated. At the moment certain new drug applications must have 12 months real-time and six months accelerated stability testing on three batches at the time of filing. Until now, ANDAs had to have just three months of accelerated stability data at filing to get two years of shelf life—confirmed later by room temperature data.
The draft FDA proposals are at the moment open for comments. They will increase the stringency of stability test for generics manufacturers similar to what is required for original marketing authorisations. An ANDA will take nine months longer before filing and cost more to develop. So in the US additional stability requirements, generics user fees and the increased documentation will continue to put pressure on smaller generics companies.
Related articles
Still no word from FDA on generic user fees
Negotiations on generic drug user fees
Source: Camargoblog, EMA, FDAnews, Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society
Guidelines
FDA issues guidance on AI use in drug and biologicals regulatory decision making
ICH adopts Good Clinical Practice Guideline for clinical trials
Reports
FTC reveals extent of PBM drug mark-ups and profits
Latin American patients face 4.7-year wait for innovative treatments
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 05/11/2024
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 18/09/2024
China’s NMPA expands global ties with the Netherlands and Indonesia

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 04/09/2024
Japan's PMDA expands influence with new office in Thailand

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 06/08/2024
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets

Post your comment