Following a number of stakeholder consultations including the 2018 Consultation on the Naming of Biologic Drugs [1], Health Canada has decided that biological drugs, including biosimilars, will be identified by their unique brand name and non-proprietary (common) name, without the addition of a product-specific suffix. Under this naming convention, both the brand name and non-proprietary name should be used throughout the medication use process so that biologicals that share the same non-proprietary name can be distinguished by their unique brand names.
Health Canada announces naming convention for biologicals
Home/Policies & Legislation
|
Posted 26/04/2019
0
Post your comment

All biologicals, including biosimilars, will continue to have a unique Drug Identification Number (DIN). The DIN distinguishes key characteristics of a drug product, including the brand name, manufacturer name, medicinal ingredient(s), strength(s), dosage form, and route of administration.
This naming convention was the most favoured option among respondents to the 2018 Consultation on the Naming of Biologic Drugs. It will serve to achieve the objective of distinguishing among biologicals in prescribing, dispensing and pharmacovigilance in the Canadian context without imposing an unnecessary regulatory burden. In their responses to the 2018 consultation, numerous healthcare stakeholders, including prescribers, pharmacists, patients, and drug information systems providers, indicated that unique brand names play a critical role in distinguishing among biologicals. This naming convention also avoids the complexity associated with implementation of a suffix-based naming convention with retroactive application to previously authorized biologicals.
To implement this naming convention, Health Canada will update related guidance documents and proceed with a regulatory amendment, and communicate with stakeholders on the importance of recording both brand and non-proprietary names throughout the medication use process. Health Canada will also undertake activities to assist pharmacovigilance, including updating adverse drug reaction reporting forms.
Health Canada’s recent decision on naming convention follows recent developments to biological naming guidance in Australia [2] and the US [3, 4].
Related article
WHO should finalize its BQ guidance
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Online consultation on biological drug naming in Canada [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Apr 26]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Policies-Legislation/Online-consultation-on-biological-drug-naming-in-Canada
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Australia’s TGA will keep same names for biologicals [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Apr 26]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Policies-Legislation/Australia-s-TGA-will-keep-same-names-for-biologicals
3. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA proposes update to biosimilar naming guideline [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Apr 26]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/FDA-proposes-update-to-biosimilar-naming-guideline
4. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA issues final guidance on naming biologicals [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 Apr 26]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/FDA-issues-final-guidance-on-naming-biologicals
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2019 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: Health Canada
Guidelines
FDA issues guidance on AI use in drug and biologicals regulatory decision making
ICH adopts Good Clinical Practice Guideline for clinical trials
Reports
FTC reveals extent of PBM drug mark-ups and profits
Latin American patients face 4.7-year wait for innovative treatments
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 05/11/2024
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 18/09/2024
China’s NMPA expands global ties with the Netherlands and Indonesia

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 04/09/2024
Japan's PMDA expands influence with new office in Thailand

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 06/08/2024
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets

Post your comment