The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is delaying the issue of its controversial rule on generics labelling changes, which was expected to be finalized in December 2014, until autumn 2015.
FDA delays finalization of generics labelling rule
Home/Policies & Legislation
|
Posted 05/12/2014
0
Post your comment

The new rule, which was proposed by FDA on 8 November 2013, would allow generics makers to change their labelling in the same way as brand-name manufacturers already do. FDA believes that this will speed the dissemination of new safety information about generics to healthcare professionals and patients [1].
The proposal, however, has been criticised by generics makers over concerns that different versions of drug labels could cause confusion among patients and would increase the cost of generics. The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) claims that the cost of added litigation could add US$4 billion to the nation’s annual healthcare bill [2].
FDA sought comments from the public on the proposed rule and, although the comment period closed on 13 March 2014, the agency is still reviewing the more than 100 total responses it received. This, it is believed, is the reason for the delay.
A letter, addressed to FDA and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, from Congressman Steve Israel and Congressman Timothy Bishop has also raised serious concerns with the rule, calling it ‘problematic’ and ‘harmful’. They also expressed the opinion supported by many others that ‘the FDA alone has the authority and access to the complete data to update the labels of generic medicines’.
Mr Ralph G Neas, President GPhA, summed up the problems with the proposed rule, saying, ‘as written, the rule is bad policy, bad for public safety and bad for public health’.
Related article
Healthcare providers concerned about FDA’s generics labelling rules
References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA to allow generics makers to change labelling [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2014 Dec 5]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Policies-Legislation/FDA-to-allow-generics-makers-to-change-labelling
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA’s labelling proposal will increase cost of generics [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2014 Dec 5]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Reports/FDA-s-labelling-proposal-will-increase-cost-of-generics
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2014 Pro PharmaCommunications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: GPhA, WSJ
Guidelines
Canada poised to remove requirement for Phase III trials for biosimilars
European position paper on AI in medicinal product lifecycle
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
US EO: delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American patients
Uruguay to establish independent AUVISA drug agency for healthcare reform
Malaysia announces Screening Package for new drugs and biologicals
Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’: implications for US health care
US EO: delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American patients

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 03/10/2025
Uruguay to establish independent AUVISA drug agency for healthcare reform

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 17/09/2025
Malaysia announces Screening Package for new drugs and biologicals

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 25/08/2025
Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’: implications for US health care

Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 14/08/2025
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets

Post your comment