In July 2023, Johnson & Johnson became the fourth large drugmaker to sue the US government over drug price negotiations in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). They join, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb and Astellas in claiming that price negotiations by Medicare violate the First and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution.
Four drugmakers sue the US government over the Inflation Reduction Act
Home/Pharma News | Posted 18/08/2023 0 Post your comment
It is contended that the IRA price negotiation programme is unconstitutional as it violates the Fifth Amendment stipulation that the state needs to provide just compensation for any private property taken for public use. In addition, violations to the First Amendment are made as it forces drugmakers to agree that the discounted prices, as dictated by the Department of Health and Human Services, are fair.
The Inflation Reduction Act authorized Medicare to directly negotiate drug prices for select medications. Part B drugs may be eligible to be selected for negotiation starting in 2026 for prices effective in 2028. Manufacturers are required to pay a rebate to Medicare if a drug's price increase exceeds the rate of inflation [1]. The pharmaceutical industry has repeatedly criticized many of the law’s drug pricing provisions, arguing they will limit incentives for future treatment innovation. Despite this, the Biden Administration continues to support the IRA, arguing that the IRA’s drug pricing provisions are working to help to lower healthcare costs for seniors and people with disabilities.
At the beginning of July 2023, Merck filed a motion for summary judgment asking a federal judge to rule on its case against the US government over the IRA without going to trial. Here, Merck argued that the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program ‘involves no genuine negotiations and no voluntary agreements’. According to the filing, instead, the IRA provision threatens pharmaceuticals companies with ‘enormous monetary penalties’, pushing them to provide access to their drugs at discounted prices that the government determines.
In addition, the US’s National Infusion Center Association, the Global Colon Cancer Association and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed lawsuits in federal court over aspects of the IRA. Here it was stated that the drug price negotiation program put in place by the IRA is ‘unconstitutional’, and ‘a government mandate disguised as negotiation’. Members of these trade groups include Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Related articles
Medicare drug price negotiation: what next?
Regulating drug prices in Medicare unlikely to lead to ‘revenue targeting’
LATIN AMERICAN FORUM View the latest headline article: Respuesta a Opinión sobre: Cuatro pasos para racionalizar el desarrollo de biosimilares Browse the news in the Latin American Forum! Register to receive the GaBI Latin American Forum newsletter. Inform colleagues and friends of this new initiative.
FORO LATINOAMERICANO Ver el último artículo de cabecera: Respuesta a Opinión sobre: Cuatro pasos para racionalizar el desarrollo de biosimilares !Explore las noticias en el Foro Latinoamericano! Regístrese para recibir el boletín informativo GaBI Foro Latinoamericano. Informe a colegas y amigos sobre esta nueva iniciativa. |
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Inflation Reduction Act explained [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2023 Aug 18]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/policies-legislation/inflation-reduction-act-explained
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2023 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Guidelines
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
New regulations in Brazil for the registration of biosimilars
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Meitheal expands portfolio with three biosimilars through exclusive US licensing agreement
EMS proposes merger with Hypera to form Brazil's largest drugmaker
Bio-Thera and Gedeon Richter partner to commercialize Stelara biosimilar BAT2206
Advances for Biocon Biologics’ Stelara and Eylea biosimilars
Comments (0)
Post your comment