The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has started proceedings in the Federal Court against Pfizer Australia (Pfizer) alleging that offers made by Pfizer to pharmacies before the expiry of the patents for its blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug Liptor (atorvastatin) were anticompetitive.
Anticompetitive practices come under scrutiny in Australia
Home/Pharma News | Posted 28/03/2014 0 Post your comment
Prior to the loss of patent protection in May 2012, Lipitor was prescribed to over one million Australians, with annual sales exceeding AUS$700 million.
The ACCC is alleging that Pfizer offered significant discounts and rebates previously accrued on Lipitor sales on the condition that pharmacies acquired a minimum volume of up to 12 months’ supply of Pfizer’s generic atorvastatin product. These offers were made in early 2012, prior to Lipitor’s patent expiry and before other generics were allowed to enter the market.
The ACCC believes that Pfizer engaged in this conduct in order to deter or prevent competition from generics, which the ACCC then deems as anticompetitive.
The ACCC is seeking monetary penalties, declarations and costs. A directions hearing will be held on 18 March 2014 in the Federal Court in Sydney.
This is not the first time that Pfizer has tried such tactics. Prior to patent expiry in the US the company urged pharmacists to ‘block prescriptions for a generic version of Pfizer’s Lipitor’ in exchange for discounts on the brand-name drug [1].
Related articles
EU problematic patent settlements remain at low level
US Supreme Court backs FTC in pay-for-delay case
Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Pfizer continues to fight for Lipitor [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2014 Mar 28]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Generics/News/Pfizer-continues-to-fight-for-Lipitor
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2014 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: ACCC
Guidelines
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
New regulations in Brazil for the registration of biosimilars
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Meitheal expands portfolio with three biosimilars through exclusive US licensing agreement
EMS proposes merger with Hypera to form Brazil's largest drugmaker
Bio-Thera and Gedeon Richter partner to commercialize Stelara biosimilar BAT2206
Advances for Biocon Biologics’ Stelara and Eylea biosimilars
Comments (0)
Post your comment