In an effort to improve safety detection, the FDA issued a final rule and draft guidance on 29 September 2010 to clarify the requirements governing safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products subject to an investigational new drug (IND) application.
The FDA’s 2010 final rule and draft guidance
Home/Guidelines
|
Posted 04/02/2011
0
Post your comment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4c79/f4c79a59728d47498025f490d2c31c6b498ae5c1" alt="picture20 picture20"
The rule becomes effective on 28 March 2011 and also imposes safety reporting requirements on bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.
The FDA believes that the new requirements will enhance the quality of safety reporting and will strengthen the agency’s ability to review critical safety information, by reducing submissions of uninformative IND safety reports and clarifying the situations where certain adverse events should be reported as group data (as opposed to individually).
The final rule also revises several definitions and reporting standards to be more consistent with the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and the WHO’s Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the EU.
The final rule includes, amongst others, changes/clarifications to the following points:
- new terms and definitions, e.g. adverse event and suspected adverse reaction
- reporting of new safety information and IND safety reports, e.g. when IND safety reports are required
- investigator brochure, e.g. when required and what should be in it
- unblinding, e.g. use of a data monitoring committee to review unblinded data in case of suspected adverse reactions.
Most of the requirements in the final rule are not new; however, they clarify existing requirements to promote submission of meaningful safety information. Many sponsors already have processes in place for ongoing surveillance of accumulating safety information. Importantly, the FDA does not anticipate that implementation of these new requirements will require sponsors to make major changes to their current practices or ongoing clinical trials.
Source: FDA
Policies & Legislation
NPRA Malaysia trials new timelines for variation applications
Regulatory evolution and impact of simplified requirements for interchangeable biosimilars in the US
Regulatory update for post-registration of biological products in Brazil
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cab27/cab2701fb80cdfbb111b3f432f5c30aa14fc85e5" alt="20 AA010933 20 AA010933"
Home/Guidelines Posted 29/10/2024
FDA interchangeable biosimilars guidance update on revised approach to switching studies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34f31/34f311444a7ddfcbd83ae0359f9889a3a79e75ca" alt="Interchangeability V18K30 Interchangeability V18K30"
Home/Guidelines Posted 23/07/2024
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f56/65f56256e84d1d234b8ee68436e81b900a51d6ec" alt="picture09 picture09"
Post your comment