In an effort to improve safety detection, the FDA issued a final rule and draft guidance on 29 September 2010 to clarify the requirements governing safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products subject to an investigational new drug (IND) application.
The FDA’s 2010 final rule and draft guidance
Home/Guidelines
|
Posted 04/02/2011
0
Post your comment
The rule becomes effective on 28 March 2011 and also imposes safety reporting requirements on bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.
The FDA believes that the new requirements will enhance the quality of safety reporting and will strengthen the agency’s ability to review critical safety information, by reducing submissions of uninformative IND safety reports and clarifying the situations where certain adverse events should be reported as group data (as opposed to individually).
The final rule also revises several definitions and reporting standards to be more consistent with the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and the WHO’s Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the EU.
The final rule includes, amongst others, changes/clarifications to the following points:
- new terms and definitions, e.g. adverse event and suspected adverse reaction
- reporting of new safety information and IND safety reports, e.g. when IND safety reports are required
- investigator brochure, e.g. when required and what should be in it
- unblinding, e.g. use of a data monitoring committee to review unblinded data in case of suspected adverse reactions.
Most of the requirements in the final rule are not new; however, they clarify existing requirements to promote submission of meaningful safety information. Many sponsors already have processes in place for ongoing surveillance of accumulating safety information. Importantly, the FDA does not anticipate that implementation of these new requirements will require sponsors to make major changes to their current practices or ongoing clinical trials.
Source: FDA
Policies & Legislation
ANVISA and DINAVISA sign MoU to strengthen border surveillance and regulatory cooperation
Congress pushes biosimilar bills as interchangeability concerns linger
Reports
Central America moves toward joint evaluation of biosimilar medicines
The US$52 billion question: can the US keep biosimilars competitive?
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Brazil's ANVISA updates guidance on pharmacokinetic studies for biosimilars
Canada eliminates phase III trial requirement for biosimilar approvals
FDA updates draft biosimilar guidance, signalling greater flexibility for developers
FDA finalizes Guidance on Promotional Labeling and Advertising for biologicals
Brazil's ANVISA updates guidance on pharmacokinetic studies for biosimilars
Home/Guidelines Posted 20/08/2026
Canada eliminates phase III trial requirement for biosimilar approvals
Home/Guidelines Posted 22/06/2026
FDA updates draft biosimilar guidance, signalling greater flexibility for developers
Home/Guidelines Posted 12/06/2026
FDA finalizes Guidance on Promotional Labeling and Advertising for biologicals
Home/Guidelines Posted 25/05/2026
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Post your comment