China’s State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) has set out a number of proposed changes to the drug registration process, providing encouragement for domestic innovation and allowing the fast-track review of generic drugs which answer an unmet clinical need.
China’s SFDA to fast-track high-priority generics
Home/Guidelines
|
Posted 01/02/2013
0
Post your comment
Innovative drugs that involve Chinese intellectual property and/or government-directed research and development will be encouraged through fast-track reviews and regulatory approvals. Pricing and reimbursement incentives will also be offered for companies developing paediatric drugs.
The decision comes as a result of the overwhelming number of applications the SFDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) is currently trying to deal with, mainly due to repeat applications for generics already available on the Chinese market. A report by the CDE showed that 58% of the 3,950 abbreviated new drug applications received by the agency during 2012 involved products for which more than 20 generics had already been approved.
These measures, along with other measures that have been proposed to discourage applications for drugs of low clinical value or lacking in innovation, are intended to reduce CDE’s workload and reduce the time it takes for a drug to be registered in China. Currently, generics take on average four years for registration in China compared to only 2.5 years in the US.
SFDA has also committed to match international Drug Regulation Rules and is considering whether to allow data from clinical trials conducted overseas to be included in approval applications. Other proposals to reduce the CDE’s workload include increasing the involvement of China’s provincial authorities in the drug approval process.
Related article
China to release biosimilars guidelines
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and educational use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Source: IHS, SFDA
Policies & Legislation
ANVISA and DINAVISA sign MoU to strengthen border surveillance and regulatory cooperation
Congress pushes biosimilar bills as interchangeability concerns linger
Reports
Central America moves toward joint evaluation of biosimilar medicines
The US$52 billion question: can the US keep biosimilars competitive?
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Brazil's ANVISA updates guidance on pharmacokinetic studies for biosimilars
Canada eliminates phase III trial requirement for biosimilar approvals
FDA updates draft biosimilar guidance, signalling greater flexibility for developers
FDA finalizes Guidance on Promotional Labeling and Advertising for biologicals
Brazil's ANVISA updates guidance on pharmacokinetic studies for biosimilars
Home/Guidelines Posted 20/08/2026
Canada eliminates phase III trial requirement for biosimilar approvals
Home/Guidelines Posted 22/06/2026
FDA updates draft biosimilar guidance, signalling greater flexibility for developers
Home/Guidelines Posted 12/06/2026
FDA finalizes Guidance on Promotional Labeling and Advertising for biologicals
Home/Guidelines Posted 25/05/2026
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Post your comment