Biosimilarity statement unnecessary according to industry

Home/Guidelines | Posted 17/06/2016 post-comment0 Post your comment

Industry groups have expressed concerns about the proposal for a biosimilarity statement in the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) draft guidance on biosimilar labelling.

Checklist V14A17

FDA announced on 6 June 2016 that it was extending the comment period on its proposed guidance for biosimilar labelling by an additional 60 days. However, despite this extension on the March 2016 draft guidance [1], industry groups have felt it necessary to voice their concerns publicly over the agency’s proposals.

A group of healthcare and pharmaceutical supply chain organizations stated in a letter submitted to FDA on 3 June 2016 that the agency should avoid requiring a statement of biosimilarity on the product labels of biosimilars. Such a statement ‘is at best unnecessary’ according to the group. They go on to say that ‘the FDA has never required any similar statement for products found to be therapeutically equivalent, and has not provided sufficient justification for its inclusion in biosimilar labelling’. They add that any such statement could also be ‘confusing to patients and providers who are unfamiliar with this type of unprecedented statement’ and that ‘this confusion could put biosimilar utilization, and savings, at risk’.

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) and the Biosimilars Council, although supporting most aspects of the draft guidance have also expressed concern that ‘the proposed biosimilarity statement may be confusing’. The GPhA’s letter, which was also submitted to FDA on 3 June 2016, states that ‘the proposed biosimilarity statement is unnecessary to the safe and effective use of biosimilars’. They therefore propose that the statement ‘be omitted in full compliance with FDA’s labelling regulations’. The GPhA goes on to say that the biosimilarity statement ‘does not provide any information that physicians or patients need in order to use the product in a safe and effective manner’.

The GPhA is concerned that ‘the biosimilarity statement may suggest to patients and healthcare professionals that biosimilars have clinically meaningful differences from their reference products in terms of safety, purity, or potency when, in fact, they do not’. This they say could ‘impede the uptake and use of biosimilar products and impair effective competition’.

FDA’s draft guidance on biosimilar labelling is open for comment until 2 August 2016. Electronic comments can be submitted to http://www.regulations.gov and written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

Related article
GPhA raises concerns over CMS biosimilars reimbursement policy

Reference
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA issues draft guidance on biosimilars’ labelling [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2016 Jun 17]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Guidelines/FDA-issues-draft-guidance-on-biosimilars-labelling

Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.

Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2016 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.

Source: Federal Register, GPhA

comment icon Comments (0)
Post your comment
Most viewed articles
About GaBI
Home/About GaBI Posted 06/08/2009
EU guidelines for biosimilars
EMA logo 1 V13C15
Home/Guidelines Posted 08/10/2010