Such practices include strategic patenting, by which pharmaceutical companies procure numerous secondary patents that create multi-layer protection around their successful products to avoid competition on their merits alone. Dr Olga Gurgula outlines the current approach to strategic patenting and provides arguments for the intervention of competition law [3].

The denser the web of secondary patents, the more difficult it is for companies making generics to develop their generics equivalents, even if they know that only a few patents from a large portfolio would, in fact, be valid and infringed by their products [4]. Such practices, therefore, provide an appreciable competitive advantage for originators by creating significant legal and commercial uncertainty for generics in relation to the possibility of their market entry [5]. As a result, they effectively block generics competition, allowing originators to maintain artificially high drug prices and preventing patients from accessing cheaper generics.

Due to their harmful effects, strategic patenting practices require a long-overdue intervention by competition authorities. They have a considerable negative effect on consumer welfare in the form of high drug prices. In addition, strategic patenting affects dynamic competition by stifling innovation of both originator and generic drug companies. On the one hand, it may impair innovation by reducing originators’ incentives to innovate as they enjoy their monopoly position by merely procuring numerous secondary patents that shield their current product from generics’ competition. On the other hand, such practices also affect generics’ ability to develop alternative generic drug products because of the uncertainty about the patent protection and a fear of infringing on one of the numerous patents [6]. Strategic patenting may, thus, enable originators to avoid competitive pressures by preventing generics competition without a need to engage in genuine innovation.

Therefore, Dr Gurgula concludes that the current approach that views these practices lawful should be reconsidered in favour of investigating them under the competition law rules. This, in turn, will open the possibility for competition authorities to prevent their harmful effect on drug prices and pharmaceutical innovation, for the benefit of consumer welfare.

Conflict of interest
The author of the research paper [3] did not provide any conflict of interest statement.

Abstracted by Dr Olga Gurgula, Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at Brunel Law School, Brunel University London, and Visiting Fellow at the Oxford Martin Programme on Affordable Medicines, University of Oxford, UK.

GaBI Journal Citation Impact
1.7 – Citescore 2019 (calculated on 6 May 2020)
2.0 – CiteScoreTracker 2020 (Last updated on 7 February 2021)

Submit a manuscript to GaBI Journal

Related articles
The cost of evergreening strategies

Evergreening patents may make drugs too costly for patients in Thailand

References
1. Kesselheim AS, Avorn J, Sarpatwari A, The high cost of prescription drugs in the United States origins and prospects for reform. JAMA. 2016;316(8):858-71.
2. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016;47:20-33.
3. Gurgula O. Strategic patenting by pharmaceutical companies – should competition law intervene? IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law. 2020;51:1062-85.
4. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). The role of competition in the pharmaceutical sector and its benefits for consumers [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 22]. Available from: www.unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdrbpconf8d3_en.pdf
5. Abud MJ, Hall B, Helmers C. An empirical analysis of primary and secondary pharmaceutical patents in Chile. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0124257.
6. European Commission. Pharmaceutical sector inquiry final report. 8 July 2009 [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 22]. Available from: www.ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/pharmaceuticals/inquiry/staff_working_paper_part1.pdf

Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.

Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2021 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.