TRIPS flexibilities: current and future use in the SADC region

Generics/Research | Posted 13/09/2019 post-comment0 Post your comment

In response to the HIV/AIDS crisis of the late 1990s, several legal options were introduced to facilitate access to lower-cost treatments. These included flexibilities in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, known as ‘TRIPS flexibilities’. In a recent review, authors ‘t Hoen, Kujinga and Boulet describe TRIPS flexibilities and discuss their current and future use in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region [1].

HIV Aids V16K25

In the SADC region, compulsory licensing of patents and the transition provisions for the least developed countries (LDCs) members of the WTO play a critical role in the procurement of lower-priced generic medicines. Between 2001 and 2016, eight of the 15 SADC Member States, of which six are LDCs, made use of a TRIPS flexibility, totalling 15 instances in the region. Of these 15 instances, six were compulsory licences or public non-commercial use while nine involved non-enforcement of patents using the LDC transition provision. All instances were related to the provision of HIV treatment, but four of the LDCs stated that they had invoked the measure for all medicines. Every case, except for one (South Africa), was executed.

In 2010, the global health initiative Unitaid established the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) to safeguard the availability of generic HIV medicines by making patent licences available to generic producers. Today the MPP licences include all World Health Organization recommended HIV treatments, and all sub-Saharan African countries are part of the licensed territory. This makes TRIPS flexibilities for HIV medicines in the SADC region redundant; however, since this licensing practice does not yet exist for most other diseases, it remains important to ensure that TRIPS flexibilities can be invoked when required to protect public health.

For TRIPS flexibilities to be useful, they must be incorporated into national law. The SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan 2007−2013 proposed to ‘coordinate the implementation of TRIPS flexibilities to improve access to essential medicines within the SADC region’. In 2012, the SADC Strategy for Pooled Procurement of Essential Medicines and Health Commodities proposed pooled procurement of medicines using the group-contracting model, delivered through a staged approach beginning with coordinated information exchange and work sharing. This pooled procurement was designed to reduce costs and establish reserves for further procurement. The updated SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan 2015−2019 further proposed, among other actions, to:
• Collaborate with development partners to protect, include and take advantage of TRIPS flexibilities, and to assist countries in bilateral trade negotiations to conclude agreements that are not detrimental to public health;
• Strengthen the knowledge of Medicines Regulatory agencies, Intellectual Property officers and procurement agencies on issues of intellectual property and public health; and
• Facilitate local production for export; or importation for re-exportation within SADC as a regional bloc.

To conclude, experience from the SADC region demonstrates that TRIPS flexibilities have been used to effectively procure and supply lower-priced generic medicines for the treatment of HIV. TRIPS flexibilities may be needed for the procurement of lower-priced medicines for other diseases, including non-communicable diseases such as cancer, where patent-protected originator medicines are too costly.

Conflict of interest
The authors of the research paper [1] declared that there was no conflict of interest.

Related articles
Improving access to medicines: the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement

Patent challenges in the SADC region

Reference
1. ‘t Hoen E, Kujinga T, Boulet P. Patent challenges in the procurement and supply of generic new essential medicines and lessons from HIV in the southern African development community (SADC) region. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018;11:31.

Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.

Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2019 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.

comment icon Comments (0)
Post your comment
Most viewed articles
About GaBI
Home/About GaBI Posted 06/08/2009
EU guidelines for biosimilars
EMA logo 1 V13C15
Home/Guidelines Posted 08/10/2010